Dream Warrior

Deadly Vaccines

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Deadly Vaccines

Post  Manahuna on 21.05.11 11:39



How HIV-AIDS really came about





If HIV was engineered, who was responsible for it?





So how do we stop HIV?


avatar
Manahuna

Posts : 716
Join date : 2009-06-02
Location : Berlin

http://nerofix.com/id1685

Back to top Go down

Re: Deadly Vaccines

Post  Manahuna on 21.05.11 11:55

The Swine Flu Deception





14 of the 28 flu vaccines ("swine" & "seasonal") that they are pushing on us contain the mercury-compound, Thimerosal. Have you taken any of these flu vaccines? Arepanrix Fluvirin Fluzone Pandemrix Vaxigrip Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine (made by 5 different manufacturers) Afluria Fluarix FluLaval Fluviral All of these flu vaccines contain the mercury-compound, Thimerosal, which has been BANNED in Russia, Japan, all the Scandinavian countries, Canada, and the United Kingdom.





The US website, VAERS, has published statistics of adverse reactions on ONLY ONE of the swine flu vaccines:

Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine

The most recent, May 7, 2010

11,029 reports

833 classified as "Serious Health Events" -defined as, "life-threatening or death, major disability, abnormal conditions at birth, hospitalization, or extension of existing hospitalization"

56 US deaths, all "under investigation"

VAERS is required to report on ALL flu vaccines, yet only report this one.




avatar
Manahuna

Posts : 716
Join date : 2009-06-02
Location : Berlin

http://nerofix.com/id1685

Back to top Go down

Re: Deadly Vaccines

Post  Manahuna on 21.05.11 12:15

“There is proof many organizations — World Health Organization, UN as well as vaccine companies such as Baxter and Novartis — are part of a single system under the control of a core criminal group, who give the strategic leadership, and who have also funded the development, manufacturing and release of artificial viruses in order to justify mass vaccinations with a bioweapon substance in order to eliminate the people of the USA, and so gain control of the assets, resources etc of North America.”

- Jane Bürgermeister



Studies show that flu vaccines are unsafe and ineffective.





For Bill “Microsoft” Gates, the use of tainted vaccine
is justified to reduce carbon emissions by humans they
considered “worthless eaters”





Let's focus on the vaccines. Gates is stating that he considers vaccines to be useful in contributing to bring the projected population growth of 2.2 billion down to 1.3 billion, roughly one billion. What kind of properties can thus reasonably be deduced that vaccines are to have according to Gates? Well, basically all the properties that impede people to either have children, or successfully rear them. In other words, Gates implicitly advocates the definition of his favorite kind of vaccine to be one that fosters infertility, sterility and (early onset) senility (autism) alike. Note that Gates does not mention a word on the much touted purported intention of vaccines: to offer protection against relevant diseases and therefore as such, precisely prolong life. Given the abundance of toxins in vaccines, the position that vaccines contribute to decrease mortality rates, is kind of hard to maintain.



Draw you own conclusion.
avatar
Manahuna

Posts : 716
Join date : 2009-06-02
Location : Berlin

http://nerofix.com/id1685

Back to top Go down

Re: Deadly Vaccines

Post  Manahuna on 01.06.11 12:17



Narcolepsy cases rising after swine flu vaccine


http://www.thelocal.se/34044/20110528/

Ninety-three people in Sweden, most of them children, have been diagnosed with narcolepsy since taking the swine flu vaccine Pandemrix last winter, according to figures from the Swedish Medical Products Agency (Läkemedelsverket).
avatar
Manahuna

Posts : 716
Join date : 2009-06-02
Location : Berlin

http://nerofix.com/id1685

Back to top Go down

Re: Deadly Vaccines

Post  Manahuna on 02.06.11 12:28

It gets worse:


78 Percent of Pakistani Children With Polio Were Given Polio Vaccines


Thursday, 02 June 2011

'In the last year, as Pakistan has lost favor with the US and UNICEF, polio virus has paralyzed increasing numbers of Pakistani youth, casting doubt on the good intentions of those who fight polio. To make matters worse, most of the new cases have occurred in children already vaccinated. Is the US attempting to fight Pakistan by tainting inoculation doses?

The medical data suggests that the vaccine has changed in its efficacy against the disease. Last year, there were 136 cases of infected youth, and 107 of these had been administered multiple polio vaccinations. These figures are the largest the Polio Global Eradication Initiative has seen since 2006, despite heavy treatment in the most affected areas, South Punjab and the Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA).'

Read more at: http://www.naturalnews.com/032587_polio_vaccines_Pakistan.html
avatar
Manahuna

Posts : 716
Join date : 2009-06-02
Location : Berlin

http://nerofix.com/id1685

Back to top Go down

Re: Deadly Vaccines

Post  Manahuna on 26.06.11 12:42



A Look Inside The Immunization Dilemma


The 1952 polio epidemic was one of the largest and most frightening public health crises in the United States, with outbreaks in all 50 states. Of the nearly 58,000 cases reported that year, 3,145 people died and 21,269 were left paralyzed. Until 1955, when New York City’s Dr. Jonas Salk introduced his vaccine, polio was a constant terror. When asked in a televised interview who owned the patent for the vaccine, Salk replied, “There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?”

Well, times have changed. Now pharmaceutical companies are highly protective of their assets, because vaccines are not just medical breakthroughs, they are also big business. In fact, Salk’s vaccine went on to raise manufacturer Eli Lilly’s profit by 90 percent in 1956, bringing in a total of $13.7 million in revenue for the company, in addition to the millions it made other manufacturers of the time. Today, companies like Merck bring in billions by manufacturing vaccines for everything from chicken pox to the flu.

And, today, children who follow the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended schedule receive 69 doses of 16 vaccines—46 more doses than they did 30 years ago, and the highest amount given in any country in the world.

Parents, faced with a barrage of polarizing opinions and a handful of conflicting studies, remain in a constant search for definitive answers. But right now, there aren’t any.

A recent University of Michigan study found that 76 percent of parents rely on their pediatricians to make the decision.

Vaccine proponents and the medical community at large argue that vaccination is safe and that illnesses including pertussis (whooping cough), rubella and diphtheria—epidemics that once killed thousands every year—are now prevented by vaccination and the enforcement of government mandates requiring children to have certain vaccinations before they are allowed to attend school.

“Thanks to immunizations, diseases like polio that were once common, are now only distant memories for most Americans,” says the New York State Department of Health. “Today there are few visible reminders of the suffering, injuries and deaths caused by diseases that are now prevented with vaccines.”

Vaccine opponents, namely parent activists and a very small minority of doctors and scientists, argue that infant immune systems are too weak to handle these shots, and that the possible side effects of vaccination, including seizures, paralysis and death, are overlooked by pharmaceutical companies and are not worth the risk. These critics say vaccines can trigger developmental problems like autism.

“Selling vaccines is extremely profitable and the process of mandating vaccines is fraught with conflicts of interest,” Michael Belkin, father of a child who died post-vaccination, told health officials. “The business model of having the government mandate [that] everyone must buy your product is a monopolist’s delight.”

The vaccine argument has reached a stalemate, leaving the general public wondering whom they should believe. Meanwhile, parents across Long Island and the nation are faced with their first vaccination decision within hours of their infants’ birth—and, one way or the other, they need to make a choice.

SOURCE: http://www.longislandpress.com/2011/06/23/a-look-inside-the-immunization-dilemma/
avatar
Manahuna

Posts : 716
Join date : 2009-06-02
Location : Berlin

http://nerofix.com/id1685

Back to top Go down

The true story of SV40, the cancer-causing virus hidden in polio vaccines

Post  Manahuna on 29.06.11 11:14


The true story of SV40, the cancer-causing virus hidden in polio vaccines

Poliomylitis, or polio for short, is a disease that has been around since ancient times, and despite the medical advances we have made in the United States in terms of regular and natural health, there is still no cure for this dreaded, disabling disease.

An infectious viral affliction that attacks nerve cells and, at times, the body's central nervous system, polio causes a phenomenon known as muscle wasting (a decrease in the mass of muscle), and can also cause paralysis and death.

"Since 1900 there had been cycles of epidemics, each seeming to get stronger and more disastrous. The disease, whose early symptoms are like the flu, struck mostly children, although adults, including Franklin Roosevelt, caught it too," said a report in the journal A Science Odyssey.

In 1952 that all changed, when Dr. Jonas Salk, a medical student and virus researcher, developed a vaccine against polio that, two years later, was accepted for testing nationwide. The principle behind the vaccine was simple and familiar: Like the vaccine that had been developed to fight smallpox, the polio vaccine introduced a small amount of the virus into the body, which then developed antibodies and an ability to fight off more powerful strains of the disease.

Admittedly, Salk's vaccine logged early success; some 60-70 percent of those vaccinated did not develop the disease. But it also saw some early problems. About 200 people who had been vaccinated got the disease, and 11 of them died, forcing a halt to all testing. Once it was determined that a faulty, poorly manufactured batch of the vaccine was the cause of those cases, stricter production standards were implemented and full-scale vaccinations nationwide resumed once more. Four million vaccines were given by 1955; by 1959, 90 countries were using it.

That said, those early cases were far from the last time the vaccine killed. In fact, throughout its history of use, Salk's polio vaccine left a path of death its wake.

A deadly discovery
Production and nationwide distribution of the polio vaccine was in full force by the end of the 1950s, but between 1959 and 1960 Dr. Bernice Eddy, a researcher with the National Institute of Health (NIH), made a startling discovery.

While examining the minced kidney cells of rhesus monkeys - from which the the polio vaccines were derived - she discovered "that the cells would die without any apparent cause," according to a report by Michael E. Horwin, M.A., J.D., published in the Nov. 3, 2003, issue of the Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology.

Horwin writes:

Dr. Eddy discovered that the cells would die without any apparent cause. She then took suspensions of the cellular material from these kidney cell cultures and injected them into hamsters. Cancers grew in the hamsters. Shortly thereafter, scientists at the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. discovered what would later be determined to be the same virus identified by Eddy. This virus was named Simian Virus 40 or SV40 because it was the 40th simian virus found in monkey kidney cells.

A few months later, in 1960, Dr. Benjamin Sweet and Dr. Maurice Hillman, both Merck scientists, published their findings. They wrote that such viruses were common in that particular breed of money, particularly in their kidneys:

The discovery of this new virus, the vacuolating agent, represents the detection for the first time of a hitherto "non-detectable" simian virus of monkey renal cultures and raises the important question of the existence of other such viruses . . . . As shown in this report, all 3 types of Sabin's live poliovirus vaccine, now fed to millions of persons of all ages, were contaminated with vacuolating virus...

The term "vacuolating virus" is another name for SV40, Horwin said, adding that later, in 1962, Dr. Eddy published more findings regarding the link between cancer and SV40:

The (SV40) virus was injected at once into 13 newborn hamsters and 10 newborn mice. Subcutaneous neoplasms indistinguishable from those induced by the rhesus monkey kidney extracts developed in 11 of the 13 hamsters between 156 and 380 days...

Chorus of Denial
Shortly after Dr. Eddy's discovery was made public, a host of high-powered researchers and scientists, including Dr. Salk himself, stepped forward to defend the polio vaccine.

An Associated Press story published April 7, 1963 ("New Data Ties Cancer, Virus"), featured quotes from a number of scientists who all pointed out that, to date, no link between SV40 and cancer had been discovered in humans.

"It seems to me that if danger were attached to SV-40, we would recognize it by now," the AP quoted Dr. Michael B. Shimkin of the National Cancer Institute as saying. Dr. Shimkin went on to say that "the public can be reassured" because careful studies "have produced no evidence whatsoever that during the last seven years there has been an increase in leukemia or cancer which can be attributed to SV-40."

Dr. Joseph L. Melnick of Baylor University in Texas agreed, saying that there had been no link discovered, a claim echoed by Dr. Salk, according to the AP story. Even Dr. Eddy "said this virus is not known to induce tumors in man or monkeys," the report said.

Mounting Evidence
By 1960, Horwin notes, the Salk injectable polio vaccine had been given to about 98 million American children and adults, while Sabin's oral version had been given to about 10,000 Americans and tens of millions of Soviet citizens, where trials had been conducted. "It was estimated that 10% to 30% of the vaccines contained live SV40," he wrote, noting that despite the link discovered by Dr. Eddy, no federal agency and no new federal rules that regulated the manufacture, sale and distribution of vaccines required makers of the polio vaccine to "discard their SV40-contaminated poliovirus seeds which were the source for all subsequent polio vaccines."

Subsequent federal testing of the vaccines, which occurred in the mid-1960s, were also inadequate, Horwin notes, because "the fourteen-day SV40 tests were not long enough to detect the virus." Yet in the years afterward, the incidence of pediatric cancer increased.

"Indeed, the pediatric cancer rate continued to climb through the 1960's, 70's, 80's and 90's," he wrote.

That claim is backed by other research as well.

"Whether childhood cancer is becoming more common is a controversial question among scientists," writes Amy D. Kyle, for EnviroHealthPolicy.net.

"Data from the cancer tracking systems in the US suggest that childhood cancer is increasing," she adds, noting a graph which tracked the increase in pediatric cancer rates in the latter part of the 20th century.

The American Childhood Cancer Association goes a step further, stating that according to statistics, cancer is the number one killer of children in the U.S.

In 2005 the National Network for Immunization Information published a somewhat conflicting report regarding a link between SV40 and increased cancer rates.

"Although SV40 has biological properties consistent with a cancer-causing virus, it has not been conclusively established whether it has caused cancer in humans," said the report. "Epidemiological studies of groups of people who received polio vaccine during 1955-1963 do not show an increased cancer risk."

But later, the same report seems to contradict itself:

However, a number of studies have found SV40 in certain forms of cancer in humans, such as mesotheliomas - rare tumors located in the lungs - brain and bone tumors; the virus has also been found to be associated with some types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

In 2002, the IOM's (Institute of Medicine) Immunization Safety Review Committee considered that the available data was inadequate to conclude whether or not the contaminated polio vaccine may have caused cancer. Because there is biological evidence supporting the theory that SV40-contamination of polio vaccines could contribute to human cancers,the committee recommended continued public health attention in the form of policy analysis, communication, and targeted biological research.

A corresponding study by the National Academy of Sciences, conducted at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was similarly "inconclusive." A panel of medical and scientific experts charged with examining any potential link between SV40 and increased cancer risk concluded:

Available evidence is "inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between SV40-containing polio vaccines and cancer;"

The "biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming virus," one that is capable of "inducing malignant transformation of animal cells in culture;"

The "biological evidence is moderate that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions;"

The "biological evidence is moderate that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans."

In the "Significance Assessment" portion of its conclusions, the panel's final report said, "The committee concludes that concerns about exposure to SV40 through inadvertent contamination of polio vaccines are significant because of the seriousness of cancers as the possible adverse health outcomes and because of the continuing need to ensure and protect public trust in the nation's immunization program."

While the panel did not recommend "a policy review of polio vaccine by any of the national or federal vaccine advisory bodies" because the current polio vaccine is free of SV40, it did recommend "development of sensitive and specific serological tests" for the virus, as well as "development and use of ... standardized techniques for SV40 detection.

Real Cases - Real Conclusions
In a July 15, 2001 report, the San Francisco Chronicle published a story detailing an increased concern among researchers that the SV40 virus found in those early polio vaccines was indeed responsible for higher cancer rates.

"For four decades, government officials have insisted that there is no evidence the simian virus called SV40 is harmful to humans. But in recent years, dozens of scientific studies have found the virus in a steadily increasing number of rare brain, bone and lung-related tumors - the same malignant cancer SV40 causes in lab animals," the report said. "Even more troubling, the virus has been detected in tumors removed from people never inoculated with the contaminated vaccine, leading some to worry that those infected by the vaccine might be spreading SV40."

Dr. Michele Carbone of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, Ill., told the paper he believed the virus was carcinogenic in humans.

"We need to be creating therapies for people who have these cancers, and now we may be able to because we have a target - SV40," he said.

Others say the few government studies regarding the potential link have been flawed.

"The government has not sponsored any real research. Here's something possibly affecting millions of Americans, and they're indifferent," Dr. Adi Gazdar, a University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center cancer researcher, said. "Maybe they don't want to find out."

Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, a non-profit organization which advocates vaccine safety, testified before the House Government Reform Committee's subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness in September 2003 that

[T]oday, U.S. federal health agencies admit the following two facts: (1) Salk polio vaccine released for public use between 1955 and 1963 was contaminated with SV40; and SV40 has been proven to cause cancer in animals.

Continuing, Fisher said that at a 1997 conference on SV40 and human cancers held by the National Institutes of Health which she attended, "there was no disagreement among both government and non-government scientists about these two facts.

The only disagreement was whether SV40 was actually being identified in the cancerous tumors of children and adults alive today and, if it was, whether the monkey virus was in fact responsible for their cancer. Non-government scientists working in independent labs around the world said, 'Yes.' But the scientists connected with the U.S. government said 'No.'"

Fisher went on to say that "credentialed non-government scientists in multiple labs around the world continue to identify SV40 in human brain and lung cancers of children and adults and are finding that SV40 is also associated with bone cancers and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas."

Despite ongoing denials, an increasing number of researchers continue to maintain that not only is there a bona fide link between Salk's SV40-tainted vaccines and cancer, that federal government officials and agencies responsible for ensuring the safety of such vaccines - then and now - are loathe to admit it, perhaps because they fear the fallout in terms of lawsuits and lost credibility.

But eventually there is likely to be enough evidence to force a change of heart, because based on what's still being discovered about the link, the issue won't go away anytime soon.

SOURCE: http://www.naturalnews.com/032854_SV40_polio_vaccines.html#ixzz1Qeeb4xDT
avatar
Manahuna

Posts : 716
Join date : 2009-06-02
Location : Berlin

http://nerofix.com/id1685

Back to top Go down

Re: Deadly Vaccines

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum